Trace: » pong_project » pcomp_improv » xbeeworkshop » nytimesarticle » quickdraw » urban_computing » class_notes_30_october » unary_scope_resolution_operator » clay_s_introductory_talk » progress

Progress

So referencing the diagram in the research page we can group the six main emotion groups as follows:

I went ahead and created a representation of those groups with emoticons.



Though I like this categorization, there are some things I don’t like here. First of all, I am skeptical about the drawings. I still believe that they are so generic that they pass the level to invite people to participate. [Notice for the user: These drawing are going to be etched on a plexiglass with buttons connected. So users would be able to press particular buttons that remind themselves the feeling they have at that exact moment.] This can be explained in terms of “as being too wide that it is so narrow.”

I believe I need to step back from the scientific categorization here and bring certain feelings/visuals like “being sick, being overwhelmed by the classes etc.” which the user will find empathy and press intentionally. Here is what I came up with as the second version of these visuals.



On a side note the user perception is such a thing that will change its behaviours relative to its surroundings. Maybe I shouldn’t be putting those two drawings on the same page. Regarding the second part, I think I find this piece more humanistic. Although it is not strong as the first one (this could be the black↔white as well) I am more leaning towards the second approach. An approach will follows categorization of scientific results yet add couple of feelings as a spice.

Also thinking this is going to be a box which invites people to participate, I should be finding new ways of creating those invitations.

Todos